VAIM
VAIM Co., Ltd. is the South Korean company that presents Juvelook as its principal product brand and operates the current five-product Korean Juvelook portfolio. Regulator records also identify VAIM as the manufacturer of specified Juvelook and Lenisna presentations in particular markets. Those records do not establish that every Korean variant has the same registration, name, importer, or intended use outside South Korea.
Direct answer
Section titled “Direct answer”- Company and brand relationship: VAIM’s current Korean site names the company as
주식회사 바임and presents Juvelook as its own product brand. - Korean portfolio: Juvelook i, Juvelook Skin, Juvelook, Juvelook Volume, and Juvelook G are the five products currently displayed by VAIM in South Korea.
- Manufacturing evidence: Philippine and Russian regulator records identify VAIM as manufacturer of the exact Juvelook presentations recorded there; the Russian record also identifies VAIM for Lenisna 200.
- Lenisna boundary: Lenisna remains a regulator-recorded name in some international markets. It should not be replaced globally with
Juvelook Volumemerely because VAIM previously described a Korean brand consolidation. - Safety-notice boundary: the European field-safety action discussed below concerns Juvelook, lot
VJ220511, and an update restricting use in the periorbital area. It is not evidence of a recall of all Juvelook or VAIM products.
Company-role matrix
Section titled “Company-role matrix”| Product and market | VAIM role supported by the record | Registration or commercial context | Other named party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Korean Juvelook family | Product company and brand operator; official site presents all five products | VAIM describes the products as Korean Class IV medical devices and supplies one Korean intended-use statement across the displayed family | Not stated on the product page |
| Juvelook soft-tissue injectable implant, Philippines | Manufacturer, including the named Okcheon manufacturing rooms | CMDR-2024-03133B, issued August 8, 2024 and expiring August 8, 2029 | Elogio Asia Philippines Inc., importer/distributor |
| Juvelook 50 mg and Lenisna 200, Russia | Manufacturer; Daejeon and Okcheon are listed as production sites | Registration certificate RZN 2024/23973, dated November 19, 2024, records the two presentations | Market-specific authorized-representative context in the registry |
| Juvelook 50 mg and Lenisna 200, Colombia | Manufacturer named in safety report under registration 2023DM-0027970 | The report distinguishes Juvelook 50 mg from Lenisna 200 | Bio On Pharma SAS, importer |
This matrix states only the role supported in each named source. Portfolio control does not by itself prove physical manufacture, approval-holder status, or distribution rights in another market.
Current Korean Juvelook portfolio
Section titled “Current Korean Juvelook portfolio”VAIM’s official Korean product page 🔗 lists the same PDLLA-to-HA mass ratio across five products while preserving separate names and presentations:
| Korean product name | Total vial content | Declared components | What the official page establishes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juvelook i | 30 mg | PDLLA 25.5 mg + HA 4.5 mg | A distinct named Korean product presentation |
| Juvelook Skin | 30 mg | PDLLA 25.5 mg + HA 4.5 mg | A distinct named Korean product presentation, despite the same declared quantities as Juvelook i |
| Juvelook | 50 mg | PDLLA 42.5 mg + HA 7.5 mg | The core 50 mg presentation |
| Juvelook Volume | 200 mg | PDLLA 170 mg + HA 30 mg | A distinct 200 mg presentation |
| Juvelook G | 200 mg | PDLLA 170 mg + HA 30 mg | A distinct named Korean product presentation, despite the same declared quantities as Juvelook Volume |
For all five entries, the page gives the Korean intended use as subcutaneous injection of polylactide and hyaluronic acid for temporary improvement of adult facial wrinkles through physical restoration. This wording should not be transferred to another country without that market’s label or registration record.
Equal component quantities do not establish identical particle characteristics, preparation, placement, or clinical role. The Juvelook product-family page keeps those product-level distinctions separate.
VAIM announced Juvelook i and Juvelook G as new products in 2025 🔗, then described a five-product lineup when Juvelook Skin launched in June 2026 🔗. These are company portfolio statements, not substitutes for individual regulator records.
Juvelook, Juvelook Volume, and Lenisna are region-sensitive names
Section titled “Juvelook, Juvelook Volume, and Lenisna are region-sensitive names”An official VAIM-hosted account of an earlier relaunch says Raum Medical became VAIM Global and that the Juvelook and Lenisna brands were consolidated in Korea as Juvelook and Juvelook Volume (VAIM brand-relaunch account 🔗). That commercial history does not create a universal regulatory alias.
Current regulator examples preserve the boundary:
- Russia’s Roszdravnadzor device record 🔗 separately lists
Juvelookas a 50 mg vial andLenisna 200as a 200 mg vial under one November 19, 2024 registration. - Colombia’s Invima safety report 308-2024 🔗 likewise records Juvelook 50 mg and Lenisna 200 as separate presentations under registration
2023DM-0027970.
Accordingly, Lenisna, Lenisna 200, and Juvelook Volume should be treated as source- and market-specific identities. A shared company, 200 mg content, or commercial lineage is not enough to claim that labels, instructions, or approvals are interchangeable.
Regional manufacturing and registration evidence
Section titled “Regional manufacturing and registration evidence”The Philippines FDA record for CMDR-2024-03133B 🔗 identifies:
- the registered product as
Juvelook Soft Tissue Injectable Implant; - VAIM Co., Ltd. as manufacturer;
- Korea as country of origin;
- named addresses in Okcheon and Daejeon, including specific Okcheon manufacturing rooms; and
- Elogio Asia Philippines Inc. as importer/distributor.
Russia’s registration certificate independently lists VAIM production sites in Daejeon and Okcheon for the Juvelook 50 mg and Lenisna 200 presentations. Together, these records support a physical-manufacturer role for the products and markets they name. They do not establish one global approval, one global importer, or registration of Juvelook i, Skin, Volume, and G in the Philippines or Russia.
Product-specific European field-safety action
Section titled “Product-specific European field-safety action”The Italian Ministry of Health record 🔗 identifies VAIM as manufacturer, the affected device as Soft Tissue Injectable Implant Juvelook, reference 308653, and the action type as safety information. The ministry received the notice on September 3, 2024 and last updated its record on December 2, 2025.
The linked manufacturer field-safety notice, also archived by Germany’s BfArM 🔗, narrows the action further:
| Scope item | Documented limit |
|---|---|
| Product | Juvelook soft-tissue injectable implant |
| UDI-DI | (01)08800051300102 |
| Affected lot | VJ220511 |
| Triggering event | Large thickenings described after administration around the eye on July 3, 2023 |
| Identified information problem | The IFU did not clearly delimit safe and non-safe areas or the restriction on eyelid use |
| Corrective scope | IFU/safety information stating that Juvelook should not be used in the periorbital area |
The notice does not name Juvelook Volume, Lenisna, Juvelook i, Juvelook Skin, or Juvelook G as affected products. It also does not support a conclusion that all lots were recalled. A January 9, 2025 Polish regulator notice 🔗 separately publishes VAIM safety note VAIM-FSCA-03 on avoiding Juvelook use around the eyes.
Interpretation boundaries
Section titled “Interpretation boundaries”Do not use VAIM’s company or manufacturing role to infer:
- one preparation protocol for all five Korean presentations;
- one global intended use or placement plane;
- automatic equivalence between Lenisna 200 and Juvelook Volume;
- registration of the whole Korean portfolio wherever Juvelook appears in a regulator record;
- clinical superiority from product size or particle claims; or
- simple reversibility of the complete implant because HA is one component.
Related pages
Section titled “Related pages”- Juvelook provides the product-family formulation and preparation comparison.
- PDLLA explains why shared PDLLA does not make different product systems interchangeable.
- AestheFill versus Juvelook separates the REGEN Biotech and VAIM product architectures.
- Juvelook versus Juvelook Volume compares the two named Korean presentations without deriving instructions from their four-fold content difference.
- Regional regulation separates product records and safety notices by market.
- REGEN Biotech provides a separate Korean PDLLA company context.

